Da Vinci Code

May 4th, 2009

paranormal

Somebody missed the photo shoot.

(submitted by Dan)

Tags: , ,

91 Responses to “Da Vinci Code”

  1. ...... says:

    I don’t think anyone got this post….

  2. twotulips says:

    I think it’s beautiful. Even dark-matter needs love. Or is that anti-matter? *Shrug* I’m no physicist.

  3. jbdean says:

    This is disturbing! I hope the kids don’t see this. o.O

  4. Melyssa says:

    If you change the brightness of the photo, you can see the woman has been scribbled out!

  5. Jujee says:

    Way creepy…

  6. Joey says:

    Hilarious, I shall frame this XD

  7. elfdorado says:

    Maybe the woman, like so many old-school moms, is just really self-abnegating….

  8. jbkay says:

    It’s the monster from “Lost”!

  9. Thomass says:

    Is that the Energy Ghost from Scooby Do? Love the vest…

  10. Narae says:

    the caption actually made me snort!

  11. Is it just me? says:

    How did they get this Amish family to pose for the picture in the first place?

  12. zed says:

    I think that’s Satan in the background.

  13. Sean Buzzard says:

    Love the way the “erasing” was designed to look instant and cathartic, yet note the individually erased fingers.

    Some deep, deep anger at work, here.

  14. Mick says:

    It’s Lamont Cranston, his lovely wife and two beautiful children…what’s the problem?

  15. Rebecca says:

    Great. Dad went and married a Shadow Person.

  16. yousefina says:

    i think the person is there-she just got some kind of hair problem going on…. and the oldest child looks kind of angry… gettin sceered here…whf..lmao

  17. Aaron says:

    That baby looks photoshopped.

    Either that, or it’s the world’s flattest baby.

  18. BOB says:

    thats waht you get when you leave crayons lying around the house with kids

  19. Deb says:

    Am I the only one disturbed by the two-headed child?

  20. cloudberryevent says:

    Lol, I know that guy!!! Think someone did that to them, not themselves!

  21. KAYSiE NiCKOlE says:

    little girl: “i really wish this random scary scribble monster would stop following me around. when i drew him in my coloring book, i never knew he would come alive!!”

  22. KT says:

    That is without a doubt a female… at least a “man” with female parts…. Mommy broke up with Mommy. That’s gotta be a hard one to explain to the kids…

  23. jim says:

    “Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men…the Shadow knows!”

  24. Mith1215 says:

    Wow..! They are serious about that whole witness protection thing.

  25. kmg says:

    honestly, this one is more disturbing than the knitted naked “family”.

    the effeminate dad saw the need to marker out the kids mom & keep the picture, now really people, what kind of message does that send to the kids?

  26. Androgenius says:

    Okay, to throw a wrench in the gender debate: Take a look at the buttons on the shirt. It’s not foolproof, but buttons are found on the right side of most men’s shirts, whereas they are typically found on the left side of most women’s shirts (even more likely then [10-20 years ago?] than now). So the adult who has not been scribbled over is likely wearing a man’s shirt. Does that mean he/she is a man? No, of course not. It just makes it more likely.

  27. Jewelsgrl says:

    The black blob from “Ghost” is back to take the bad guys away!

  28. mike says:

    that dude is a chick and she looks like jimmy osmond!

  29. Chris says:

    Ok, what’s with the people who think that MAN is a woman? Are you so used to seeing the mullet wearing bull-dyke that you actually don’t know there were MEN who dressed that way 20 years ago when that look was in style??

    That’s a guy and two kids.

  30. CM says:

    ever heard of photoshop?

  31. JP says:

    Shouldn’t the caption read, “What’s LEAST awkward about this photo is the person that’s not there anymore.”?

    And I wish the very best for her and and her little ones… I really do. Being a single mom in this day and age is quite a challenge.

  32. noir says:

    It’s the smoke monster from Lost

  33. Tdiz says:

    Several things – a) I have no idea what’s cooler on the grinning mangirl, the tinted shades, feathered hair, or rockin’ vest, b) where is that toddler’s other hand? Look at the baby’s expression for a hint, and c) I’d put money on the fact that he scribbled on his “partner” to enhance her appearance.

  34. Bill in Houston says:

    The zone of darkness. Maybe there’s a giant, 11,000 mile long amoeba and a starship inside.

  35. Knobee says:

    Is that a young Dwight Schrute?

  36. beer says:

    seems to me the black spot is simply the shadow.

  37. Gman says:

    What makes the photo awkward is that’s it’s still hanging in their living room.

  38. misnomer says:

    Its Chewbaca!

    Really, its probably a relative that wasn’t wanting to view Heathers other mommie and scratched her out in a rage of denial.

  39. Intelligence required says:

    I’m not getting the Da Vinci Code connection.

  40. Olde English 800 says:

    That black mass is your new mommy

  41. Jonny Guitar says:

    So, after they scribbled out the evil one, when did they first think it would be appropriate to send it in to this site?

  42. Overlord says:

    Yup Dwight Schrute – these are his future beet farmers

  43. Tequila Is The New Kool Aid says:

    I’m going to guess that this couple is no longer together

  44. vodka says:

    That guy looks like Dwight Schrute. I think behind the black dot is a beet.

  45. pat says:

    Heather, I’m guessing that’s a two mommy family we’re looking at…and the babys’ head is supported on it’s siblings shoulder – not to worry.

  46. Claudette says:

    The mom and cousin It finally took a family picture wth the girls….lol

  47. Heather says:

    Why did the mom mark out the dad? Must of got a divorce. I am betting she bats for the other team.

  48. nanners says:

    I guess daddy got custody.

  49. Grk! says:

    That’s a skin condition, YOU INSENSITIVE SWINE.

  50. M says:

    It’s just a dark, ominous force in the photo…. :P

  51. Heather says:

    Ok, that is a dude……. And is that baby real? Smallest baby ever. Don’t babies heads need to be supported?

  52. Gina says:

    Um, I think that the mass in question prefers to be referred to as “African-American Mass” thankyouverymuch.

    And that is one angry, pointy-chinned toddler right there.

  53. James says:

    You should maybe read/watch The Da Vinci Code then.

  54. GLove says:

    why a beet?

  55. August says:

    That’s not Dwight. That’s Andy Partridge!

  56. Rachalrg says:

    LMAO!!!
    Dwight Schrute owns a beet farm…..too funny!

  57. S says:

    ……or is that mommy?

  58. Jennifer says:

    That’s full of win. :D

  59. Tara says:

    That’s just creepy.

  60. wiggley says:

    Or shoot yourself. Prolly less painful.

  61. Hannah F. says:

    I did, and I’m still a little blank.

    Wiggley is right, though. Dan Brown is a f***ing hack.

  62. beavis says:

    hahahahahhhaha

  63. danfo says:

    Thank you! I read all the way down to the bottom before anyone mentioned the angry child! WTF! She’s about to go all Chucky up in this photo!

  64. Epic Funny! says:

    I think we know now what eroded this marriage.

  65. Illeatabugonadare says:

    Either that, or the baby needs a change.

  66. Erica says:

    no, no… look at the picture again. The baby IS being supported by the person who has been scratched out of the photo.

    Cheers!

Leave a Reply