Watchman

August 22nd, 2009

Watchman - *AFP Hall Of Fame*

Timeless.

(submitted by Wanda)

503 Responses to “Watchman”

  1. Juls says:

    With that mullet he’s all business in the front and havin’ a party in the back! The watch proves it!

  2. SashaJo says:

    Nope – we’ve all got it wrong. There is an invisible half-wall in front of him. He didn’t realize that his lower half was showing!!

    /shudders
    //going to look for the eye bleach

  3. Lori says:

    Yea, I’m not so sure that head belongs on that body. Seems a bit out of proportion. But gotta love the fact that the outlet “blends” with the background!

  4. Lilith says:

    I bet he’s saying “I’m late! I’m late! For a very important date!”

  5. Oy Vay! says:

    What time is it? SEXY time!

  6. Penna says:

    Hot DAMN!

  7. Starr says:

    I hate when my boyfriend borrows my thong…

  8. Emma says:

    What I love the most is the spraypainted backdrop – including the power point painted to match.

  9. Doc says:

    Another one of those pics that got more disturbing the farther down I scrolled.

    Fun game . . . what do you think his name is?

  10. rifraf66 says:

    That would be…… why is there NO compound bow when you need it!!!!Yikeeeeeeees

  11. KaHarta says:

    ….”Hey Bob, have you seen my tube socks…..?”

  12. rifraf66 says:

    Why is there compound bow when you need it!!!!!!!yikeeeeeeees

  13. j.j. says:

    oh look at the time

  14. kymm says:

    Well, he does have rather nice legs… and slender hips.

  15. patkerash says:

    I see London, I see France…..I’ve seen more than enough now put on some pants

  16. jeez says:

    ITS BOOMHOWER

  17. Jenany says:

    “Bruno: The Early Years”

  18. ferfer says:

    plug him into the outlet and he glows in the dark!

  19. Sarah says:

    i feel sorry for the photographer. maybe they were just starting their business and were taking any work they could get.

  20. ditt says:

    Does anyone else see the Emilio Estevez resemblance?

  21. Belinda says:

    He looks like my ex-husband, only my ex was wearing a frog g-string and the same sappy expression.

  22. Denise says:

    This picture just took me through the 7 stages of grief.

  23. Kathy says:

    Wow. Just wow.

  24. Nyria says:

    If this wasn’t so dated I would think it was staged just to be put on this site – it’s that awkward.

  25. Deb says:

    I’m a suave, manly kind of guy that likes to roam around badly painted rooms in my inappropriately tight-fitting underwear. When I need to know what time it is, I want a timepiece that is both reliable and stylish enough for my inexplicable lifestyle…

  26. wreck says:

    “Handsome Boy Male Modeling” (any Chris Elliott fans?)

  27. Holly says:

    The most awkward part of this portrait is the mullett. Short for the office (that’s why he needs the watch); long for the ladies.

  28. Brynne says:

    Why is it that I’m extra creeped out by the (not)semi-hidden electrical outlet behind him? *shudder*

  29. Karen says:

    Oh my …… my …. my …. goodness. Just oh my goodness. And what about that paint job on the wall. Just WOW

  30. MsPKJ says:

    It is odd the first thing i noticed was the outlet in the wall…

  31. JRae says:

    I just noticed his watch- where’s this guy going?!?!

  32. cheesewhiz says:

    Wow. I don’t even know what to say about this one. Was it a glamour shots op??

  33. Cee says:

    Perhaps this young man going into modelling and he needed a portfolio.. he’s got the hair for it! :-)

    • Christa1023 says:

      I don’t think male entertainers require a head shot (well, in this case a body shot – unless it was for Chippendales), but then again, ya never know….

  34. Victoria says:

    Up until now, I have not been able to understand the current obsession with male waxing. I’m starting to see the light.

  35. binkymae says:

    ” Time’s a wastin’ “

  36. Ellen says:

    No that’s creepier than the grandma with her fresh kill.

  37. nicswife says:

    glamor shots gone very very wrong.

  38. chris says:

    On a scale of 1 to 10 of awkwardness, this gets a 12!

  39. Charlene says:

    Rrrrowr…

  40. PHEW says:

    Rockin the banana hammock with my BULOVA!!!

  41. Deann says:

    It takes a licking…

  42. wombat girl says:

    Dang; I was not prepared for that.

  43. M.B. says:

    I say this is Photoshopped. And not very well either, I might add.

    • wondering says:

      I disagree. Anyone who is old enough to remember the 80′s would have no problem believing that this picture was taken without any embarrassment or hesitation! It was a magical time!

      • Anna says:

        I think it’s photoshopped, too. Look at his feet…the tips of his toes kind of disappear.

      • Joey says:

        Except, upon slight magnification, you can see that whoever tweaked this picture did have a decent concept of the theory of a good blend. He/she tried to use the clavicle area as the merging part of two pictures. Only problem is the abrupt change in skin tone, proportion, and lighting. If this pic were real, someone needs to explain the reverse farmer’s tan on this boy. Golden brown from the feet up to just above the chest-hair line, then suddenly pasty white. Also, they didn’t do too hot on the toes. I’m not quick to jump to the ‘photoshop!’ cry, and am easily annoyed when others do, seeing as I use photo-editing programs and know enough to know the limitations of such programs. I spotted the errors nearly instantly. This my friends, is a manip.

        • lili says:

          I think it’s an old photo that was scanned. You can see the creases and stuff, it was probably all folded over. If it was from the ’80′s it’s a twenty year old photo that could have been damaged and the scan picked up all the folds. Photoshopped or not, it’s still awkwardly absurd.

      • Connie says:

        Yes. I agree.

    • EAM says:

      Yup, PhotoShopped. And I agree, it’s pretty obvious although they did catch the flavor of the era. A for effort if not execution.

    • mel says:

      Darn it mb you beat me to it…i was going to say on the count of one, two, three…everyone…PHOTOSHOPPED…LOL!

    • Photoshopper says:

      I do think this image was Photoshopped. Look at the size of the head in proportion to the shoulders as well as the skin coloration. I think two amusing pieces (the fancy underwear combined with mullet and mustache) were brought together to make it that much more outrageous. However, the body on its own is enough for an awkward photo, digitally “enhanced” or not.

  44. kelcut says:

    Yet another where only one word comes to mind…
    WHY??!!

  45. Syncha says:

    Oh my…

  46. Scott says:

    Me Tarzan, you Ja…uh, where’d you go Jane?

  47. Aimee Talbot says:

    What time is it? Time for Jungle Love!

  48. Serendipity says:

    Nice watch.

Leave a Reply

View Mobile Site
spread the awkwardness