Lost In Translation

May 4th, 2014

Lost In Translation - Babies

Let’s hope they saved their receipt.

(submitted by Allen)

16 Responses to “Lost In Translation”

  1. Ginna says:

    The worst part was when the cake decorator finished, stepped back and looked at it for a few seconds, then said “That’s not too bad” and meant it.

  2. Christine says:

    the arms and fingers on the bottle are disturbing as well. The arms look like flesh-colored turds and the fingers are little brown blobs

  3. Victoria says:

    Horrible lol.. Anyone w 1/2 a brain would say “Maybe I should redo the diaper and bottle”

  4. CB says:

    oh boy!

  5. Elyse says:

    Hmm…It must be twins because the writing says “girl”,but the cake is obviously a boy ;-)

  6. Randy Hicks says:

    Looks like a very happy baby. lol

  7. Elen says:

    probably of a diaper and a baby bottle…but came out as NFFW

  8. Kellie says:

    That is just wrong on so many levels. O_o

  9. Emily says:

    Amazing how one line of frosting changes the entire meaning.

  10. Lollerskate says:

    On the bright side, if the baby ends up being a boy, it’s salvage-able!

  11. LB says:

    no no no no NO NO NO NO. no. no. no.

  12. Bev says:

    Clearly it’s a boy, why did they write “baby girl” on it? lol

  13. Gene says:

    Now the words clearly say it is a baby GIRL.

  14. D F Stuckey says:

    I . . . I HOPE that’s a bottle . . . .

  15. 3kidmama says:

    Yikes! What was the decorator thinking????

Leave a Reply

View Mobile Site
spread the awkwardness