Brings us back to simpler times when all we needed were a few pumps.
(submitted by Nicole)
Maybe they were in a cult.
All they need are some accordians and they could go play at the local Oktoberfest!
Looks an awful like like Richard Marx there…without the mullet.
Their legs are totally interchangeable.
true religion jeans is very good jeans style.. good looking.. so many people bought them from us. If you like them. You can buy from me too.. they are good looking and quality top best. I am sure you like them after you get. .you can try too. Lol
I think she is smiling due to the fact that she was able to modify their Osh Kosh overalls into matching outfits ( note:the special kangaroo pouch on their chests)…He is just smiling because he wants to keep the peace and nobody with ever see this pic anyway !!! boy was he wrong, thanks to Nicole and AFP
Lol … the angle + the outfits + the big hair makes them look 3 feet tall.
Hansel and Gretel – they never did leave the woods – such fond memories of candy houses and child-baking witches.
Well that’s going to leave a scar.
They missed the new Charlie and the Chocolate factory movie by a few years.
Yup…she’s got a banana clip in her hair, alright.
You KNOW they got these outfits at Merry Go Round.
If they were wearing lederhosen, then YES, I could understand the comments about Oktoberfest but they are wearing OVERALLS.
Obviously they are conjoined twins. It’s one outfit.
I’m certain this is the 90′s, not the 80′s, the 90′s were worse. And I recall outfits very similar to these around 1995.
Are you kidding? Where were you in 1995, Moscow? Tashkent? This is so 1987.
Definitely the 80′s.
My forensic analysis: Patch/insignia of some kind of the front pouch suggests a uniform of some kind. Footwear suggests they have to spend lots of time on their feet. They seem too normal (well, normal for the ’80s) to be a couple who would voluntarily dress up like this. Physical contact is close, but not too close suggests a platonic male/female relationship.
Conclusion: This was a work related photo of two co-workers…no other plausible explanation.
With her sleeve rolled up like that (and his down) could they have been part of a gang?
You are looking at a man in luuuuuvvvvv. Otherwise he won’t be caught dead in that outfit.
Unfortunately the camera angle and lighting distort everything in this photo.
Because of the lighting it appears that they are wearing the same outfit in a hideous color…that color does not exist.
The camera angle makes it look like the “bibs” are cut off near the knees…not possible.
Plus the camera angle forces the tongues of his shoes to “jut forward” making it look like the bulbous end of turkey basters…how silly.
A better angle and better lighting would’ve prevented her hair from looking like a “big hair” mullet…how embarrassing.
Obviously photography is not for the inexperienced.
I am crying laughing!!
Here I thought it ’twas the outfits and shoes and I read your comment and discovered
that was a “fig newton of my emancipation”……
[color me blushing:D]
Does so exist, that color.
all they need are huge neon condoms and pacifiers and it salt n peppa
Nope that would be TLC no pacifiers for salt n peppa
oh, I stand corrected… it’s been too long (and that’s a good thing!)
I think it’s great that the caption, of all things, is about the shoes. I used to own a pair of Reebok Pumps…
“Brings us back to simpler times when all we needed were a few pumps.”
Pump up shoes! My sons HAD to have those in the 80s! Of course, they were under 12 years old. LOL
“Did you fall?”
And a banana clip in our hair, you know she has one in there! LOL!
ummmmm [scratching my head]
errrrrrrrrr[rubbing my eyes]
[humming under my breath]
Okay. I’ll go ahead and ask.
Is this a couple or do you suppose it’s a weird brother/sister singing/dancing act? Perhaps about to perform at King’s Island circa 1987?
and lots of hairspray!
Tim and his sister return yearly to walk through the big-hair forest. This year, there is a wedgie contest.
this comment made my day.
It’s so cute when mom dresses adult siblings alike!
love it! I remember those days! Those shoes seemed almost magical
Wow. Married? Or brother and sister? Wow.
both of the above?!
“That outfit is wearing you, Felix.”
YES!! Thanks for putting me feeling into the totally correct words!
I hope this is just some goofy uniform they had to wear for work, and not an outfit they picked out on their own.
Gee, wonder whose idea THIS was?
C’mon, guys. Your socks don’t match. Let’s try again–and this time, when I say “you gotta match, you gotta MATCH.”
I’ve been working on the railroad…
There are some outfits that are dated before you even get the last piece buttoned up.
Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa this is funnier than Hall! OMG – what a ‘gas’.
Maybe they’re manning the Materhorn ride at Disneyland.
Please, someone explain their outfits to me!
her idea or his?
Pump up the Jam? LMAO …they look like hip-hop Dutch yodelers. Just replace the Converse with wooden clogs and it’s ON… YEAH BABY! ahahahahaha!!
lmao…(wipes tears of cheek)
Wonder twins day off..
Chicken dance! An-a-one, an-a-two…
they are wearing those outfits and you’re posting about the hair????
I think the caption is referring to his air shoes but…yeah. =D
On second thought maybe hip-hop dancing. You know what…it’s a losing battle to try to analyze the 80′s.
My thought was on the shoes.. but I wasn’t sure and this is why I’m checking comments. lol
Those appear to be “air overalls”! Lol!
I think the outfits go with the shoes, which are pumps
oompa loompa oompaddy do, they’ve got another riddle for you…oompa loompa oompaddy det, she really hates him for losing that bet.
Matching outifts for anyone except identical twins under the age of five should be forbidden.
I seriously hope they were headed to an Oktoberfest.
Either that or they both work for the worst theme restaurant ever!
It’s like Hansel and Gretel jumped in their time machine and landed in 1988.
OMG as soon as I saw that pic I thought “Hansel and Gretel go 80′s!” I hadn’t seen your comment yet!
NO they look like Jack and Jill. LOl!
email (will not be published) (required)